BRADY BYRUM v. ROBERT BATY

Originally Posted October 29, 2016

by Robert Baty

Proposition

Kent Hovind was innocent of the charges for which he was convicted in 2006.

Brady Byrum – Affirm

Robert Baty – Deny

---

Brady, you and Kent have been hiding out for years while promoting your false legal narrative regarding Kent’s 2006 case.

Now that you have released “Kent Hovind Innocence DVD” which reportedly includes a letter writing scheme of some kind that will allegedly result in, if successful, the reversal of Kent’s convictions and the awarding of up to $30,000,000.00 to him, it’s time for you or Kent or some other surrogate to come out and face the legitimate opposition and pursue a discussion in the public square as to the merits of your scheme and legal claims.

Brady, you seem to have made up your mind that Kent was “truly innocent”.

I have made up my mind that he was “truly guilty”.

Brady, you have yet to demonstrate you are willing to examine the truth.

I am ready to engage in that examination of the truth.

Brady, you don’t need to hide your scheme and demonstrate, implicitly, that it’s not about the truth but the money.

I don’t need to bother acquiring your DVD package.  You are welcome to send me a complimentary package for reference if you wish to make reference to anything therein as you make your effort to support your proposition as stated above.  That is, if you are willing to come out and examine the truth claims and test your position.

Brady, you and Kent and your followers are welcome to go on believing whatever you want regarding Kent’s long criminal history.  “We” are watching as you continue to promote what appears to clearly be a false legal narrative, and that for the money.

I think you know the truth, and that you are wrong.  Kent has already admitted that the reason he doesn’t face me is because he knows I am right and he, and you, are wrong.

I know the truth of the matter.

Kent knows the truth of the matter.

You know the truth of the matter.

We all know that we know the truth of the matter.

Now, Brady, lets get together and complete this exercise so many in the rest of the world will also come to a knowledge of the truth regarding Kent Hovind, his long criminal history, and what Kent, and you, really think about “we the people”.

Signed: Robert Baty – October 29, 2016

Related article on this website:

http://kehvrlb.com/a-hovind-legal-surprise-finally-50-ha-ha-ha

---

 

Link to video from which following image was taken:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUuZrNmrNNA

Clear text of Brady’s comments above:

“For your information, I am fully aware that there were more charges than the Structuring, and I have analyzed those charges as well, and they too are pure fraud. But don’t worry yourself about that.  There were 58 counts in three groups.  1-12, 13-57 and count 58.  I have spent the last 15 months in my analysis and writing this video series out.If you are already convinced Kent was guilty of all counts, and you are choosing to not examine the truth, then don’t bother acquiring the INNOCENCE DVD Package, and you can comfortably go on believing whatever you wish.  You are free to do so.  But if you really want to know what happened, and how and why Kent was truly innocent, then I believe you will need this information to fully learn that.”

---

---

Typical of Kent and Brady, the promotional video gives no actual references to support their claim(s).

So, I will with a little speculation offer two references that might explain their legal blundering regarding Form 4789.

#1 The Reinis Case (conviction reversed)

https://casetext.com/case/us-v-reinis

#2 The Hoyland Case (conviction affirmed)

http://openjurist.org/960/f2d/94/united-states-v-hoyland

Won’t it be funny if Brady’s Blundering is as simple as is reflected in those 2 cases!

---

UPDATE: Information from the back of the video box