Watch for Updates

.

https://www.facebook.com/glenwood.allens.9/posts/100377174134157

.

To start the conversation archived at the above link, Glenwood Allens “shared” on his FaceBook page a posting by Susan Cobb, C. Clarke & Danielle Holm’s #1 cheerleader/promoter, featuring the video at the following link and adding his starting comments shown below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5mH6VRLKkE&sns=fb

,

As she has done so often before, Susan Cobb is again claiming to be working on some super secret project which will soon be revealed and so astound the world with truths regarding the Baby Holm case.  Liar, liar, Susan Cobb is a liar (see related articles on this site for details).

.

Begin Archived Cobb-Allens Exchange

.

(1)

From: Glenwood Allens

To: Susan Cobb

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 12:05 AM MT

.

Ahhh! The ole’ Susan Cobb! No shocker that she would AGAIN promote a false claim! You know Susan, it’s sad that you deny the truth. Step into the Light, and let the truth come out on the Holm’s, alrighty?!

.

(2)

From: Susan Cobb

To: Glenwood Allens

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 6:00 AM MT

.

Thanks for the share. Here is the truth on the Holms.

.

We are preparing much more to release. www.letourbabiesgo.com. 

.

I notice you follow Jesus. You must be attacking me because you remain convinced we are not following the same Bible and Lord. The only truth I can imagine you would want known about the Holms is that they have the wrong religion.

.

Their baby was taken for that very reason but they do not claim to be Christians.

.

There baby was kept for more sinister reasons than the one taken. On that web site follow down to the bottom under pages until you get to number 19. There lies the danger to ALL Christians. One day we will spend eternity together. We should consider making peace now, eh?

.

(3)

From: Glenwood Allens

To: Susan Cobb

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 10:00 AM MT

.

No.
.
1. I do not believe in this “unitarianism” movement where everyone that knows the Name of Jesus goes to Heaven.
.
2. The Holm’s keep lying and saying that their child was “kidnapped”.
.
The Holm’s know that they have to lie to keep up the campaign they’ve started. They refuse to accept the fact that they were found to be (and are) inadequate parents. It is the belief of my many others that since Christian bailed out on his last child, they could be doing the same here.

.

(4)

From: Susan Cobb

To: Glenwood Allens

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 10:05 AM MT

.

Well, we agree on one thing so we should start with that. Believing in God is not getting anyone through the pearly gates because Jesus said even the devils believe. That can nclude those who go to church and cast out those same devils in Jesus name (thus we have the Calvinists to point that out for us). Matthew 25 does not negate all the others who do so but rather shows us that religious pursuits and accomplishments in themselves are not sufficient proof that God lives in us and includes us in his family.

.

So, moving on to your point number two, their child was absolutely kidnapped and we are in the process of not only proving that further but also proving that no one’s child is safe.

.

Children now belong to the state, and parents as the incubators merely provide the future labor force. The state in the interests of the greater good oversees and manages the state’s interests and now has the primary responsibility for the child.

.

Perhaps you were not aware.

.

Point three is Danielle and Christian have never been inadequate parents based on the parenting they have had this far. Pregnancy care was beyond excellent, labor and delivery showed extreme good judgment, after birth was perfect by all modern criteria and birth records up until the time baby was kidnapped.

.

It was downhill all the way after that but Holms have performed superhuman feats in their attempt to rescue their stolen child from the kidnappers.

.

That will be shown to the world and the world will judge.

.

Trolls will not be permitted to control the narrative.

.

Christian’s ongoing lifelong relationship with his older son is not open for discussion at this time. That one was never forsaken or abandoned. That one remains both protected and provided for, and definitely loves his daddy.

.

You appear worried and fearful, judgmental and very religious.

Are these the attributes you wish to share with the world in regards to who Jesus is to you?

.

(5)

From: Glenwood Allens

To: Susan Cobb

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 10:30 AM MT

.

I am not religious, and you and I do not have the same god. 
.
1. I am not worried/fearful
2. I am not judgmental
.
I simply shed light on the Truth that is in darkness, and I find it odd they refuse to talk about his other son, as if he has something to hide.
.
Christian still has also yet to prove that he does not receive SSI benefits for his mental disability. It has yet to be proven that he does not have what he is believed to have.
.
Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior, and I have known Him a very long time. I Preach the Truth, and only the Truth.

.

(6)

From: Susan Cobb

To: Glenwood Allens

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 11:00 AM MT

.

Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior, and I have known Him over six decades. That’s a long time too, but I didn’t know we were in a contest. I preach the truth, and only the truth. Also. Are you sure we don’t have the same God?

.

(7)

From: Susan Cobb

To: Glenwood Allens

Date: March 7, 2018

Time: 11:05 AM MT

.

Christian has to prove to you?

Why?

Social Security knows the truth.

If you are anybody who is somebody, ask them, right?

No problem there.

.

BTW, HIPAA has access to that kind of truth and the ones who have business and the power to do so have already accessed it.

.

So, no, he isn’t on Social Security.

Just as he said.

.

You have to prove to all of us that you really have the God you say you have. It is believed that you don’t. You don’t mind proving it, do you? I mean, it’s not like you have a baby being held prisoner or anything if you don’t get the right answers, so there should be no concern. What have you got to lose?

.

After renewing their exchange today, March 8, 2018, Susan posted the following which I take note of (I may or may not be able to complete the exchange, but this is a pretty good demonstration as to how it went and Glenwood Allens posted a response noting Susan’s hypocrisy in making such claims).

.

No, I am not Glenwood Allens.  The following exchange is from the Glenwood Allens thread at the following link, and following the graphic is my commentary for Susan:

https://www.facebook.com/glenwood.allens.9/posts/100377174134157

 

 

.




Comments

Susan Cobb v. Glenwood Allens — No Comments

Leave a Reply