https://www.facebook.com/susandunncobb

 

.

Watch for Updates

.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/susan-cobb/religious-beliefs-now-regarded-as-schizophrenia-newborn-confiscated/1836943119650478/

.

.

TEXT

.

“Meet Danielle. She finds herself needing to be constantly in service speaking truth, and having to defend the truth with highly paid attorneys, representatives of the state, various trolls, “bots”, and other interesting characters determined to disparage her and her husband for fighting with everything they have to recover their kidnapped baby. This has occurred for 16 months and the attacks increase daily. Christian and Danielle remain strong.”

.

– Susan Cobb 

– February 19, 2018

.

.

TEXT

.

“Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness characterized by incoherent or illogical thoughts, bizarre behavior and speech, and delusions or hallucinations, such as hearing voices. Schizophrenia typically begins in early adulthood.”

.

.

.

Commentary – The False Holm Narrative

.

Danielle and C. Clarke Holm do not tell the truth regarding the substance of their custody case regarding Baby Holm, who was taken in to State of Alabama custody in October of 2016 and remains in such custody to this day, February 19, 2018.

.

Susan Cobb, their #1 cheerleader, has been instrumental in promoting the false Holm narrative as reflected in the reference at the top of this article and which has been promoted for months.

.

I was attracted to the case upon hearing an announcement that Kent Hovind’s man Brady Byrum, a known “sovereign citizen” promoter/practitioner, was secretly meddling in the Baby Holm case on behalf of C. Clarke & Danielle Holm.  He was, reportedly, responsible for crafting a 25-page letter to mail out to various public officials, which resulted in termination of visitation for 5 weeks, and a later federal lawsuit which was quickly determined to be without merit and was dismissed.  C. Clarke & Danielle Holm have yet to give a full account of that and have continued to associate with and use and promote “sovereign citizen” theology and tactics.

.

See:

.

http://kehvrlb.com/kents-brady-byrum-meddling-in-baby-holm-case

.

The public record clearly shows that C. Clarke Holm was diagnosed with schizophrenia and delusional disorder and has had mental health issues throughout his adulthood.  His public displays/antics over the last 16 months has been consistent with the definition noted above.

.

That C. Clarke Holm’s religious notions may, in part, be considered symptomatic of his diagnosed schizophrenia and delusional disorder is no indication that “religious beliefs are now regarded as schizophrenia”.  Whether or not religious beliefs are reflective of schizophrenia and/or delusional disorder depends on the particulars of the individual cases that may be under consideration.  C. Clarke’s religious beliefs/claims/preaching are only one aspect of a complex evaluation appropriate to making such a diagnosis.  Schizophrenic notions/actions/claims under the guise of “religion” are still schizophrenic notions/actions/claims.

.

C. Clarke & Danielle Holm, among many other things, have refused to disclose the full and appropriate mental health records relevant to allowing the public to consider the record and make a more informed decision.  That history, reportedly, led C. Clarke and Danielle to apply for Social Security Disability benefits for C. Clarke and they were successful in that effort, which they now would like to make go away; claiming they no longer receive benefits and will never again seek such benefits and claiming that any schizophrenia or delusional disorder diagnosis was in error.

.

C. Clarke & Danielle Holm have not been “fighting with everything they have to recover their kidnapped baby”.  Their baby was not kidnapped.  They have been fighting with everything they have for 16 months to insure that the State of Alabama would have no good reason for reaching the conclusion that they were able and willing to provide for the child and that it should be returned.  And so the State of Alabama has been easily able to justify continuation of State custody of Baby Holm.

.

The “Understanding The Baby Holm Case” FaceBook group at the following FaceBook address has been telling the truth about the case, in opposition to the false Holm narrative, for over 14 months:

.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1425578747477117/

.

Propositions for Discussion

.

Proposition #1 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in taking custody of Baby Holm in October of 2016, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny

.

.

Proposition #2 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in retaining custody of Baby Holm, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny

.

.

One of Susan Cobb’s most recent boasts, with my comments following.  Screenshot from C. Clarke Holm’s FaceBook thread at:

https://www.facebook.com/christian.clarke.holm/posts/1619033968172151

“We” would NOT be surprised.  “We” know quite well much of what the Holms have tried, but what they have tried has NOT been designed to “get their baby back”.  It has been designed to showcase their anti-government/sovereign citizen theology and insure the baby is NOT returned; and it has worked (the baby has NOT been returned).  ~ Robert Baty

Nope!  Susan, there are no surprises in what secrets you may be keeping, and that you have to keep such claims secret tells us that “you got nothin'”!

.

Susan back on my “bots” in this recent post from Danielle’s FaceBook page thread at:

https://www.facebook.com/danielle.holm.395/posts/211503142759561

.

 

.

 

 

 

 

.


Comments

Susan Cobb – Liar, Liar! — No Comments

Leave a Reply