C. Clarke and Danielle Holm have cited U.S. Supreme Court case law, state law and constitutional law in their case and it is absolute proof that the State of Alabama is abusing their family.


– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Affirm

– Robert Baty: Deny




A cast 2020


UPDATE May 21, 2017 From Danielle Holm with my analysis following:

A cast 2021


My Analysis

I have noted that Danielle has repeatedly claimed she has been doing “so much” to get the baby returned to them, without offering any evidence that such is the case.

This appears to be another example, but I recall numerous examples of what she and her husband have done that has tended to insure that the custody issue would not be resolved with the return of the baby any time soon, such as:

1. Involving Medical Kidnap to report the story.

2. Involving Brady Byrum and sending out that “25-page” letter.

3. Filing a frivolous federal habeas corpus suit.

4. Going “full sovcit” in traffic court.

5. Going “full sovcit” at a child support hearing.

6. Falsely representing the facts and the law relevant to the case.

So, Danielle, can you be explicit in detailing just what it is that you think amounts to a lot of work designed to affect the return of the baby to you?



A cast 2022


A cast 2023

A cast 2024


A cast 2025


C. Clarke Holm – The Latest Challenge! — No Comments

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>