Watch for Updates

.

.

Venue

https://www.facebook.com/peterreillycpa/posts/10211326304828419

.

Brent’s Opening Posts

.

Discussion on December 17, 2018

.

From Robert Baty

My challenge remains outstanding for Kent Hovind to face me, keyboard to keyboard, and deal with his false legal narrative, perhaps starting with his years long lying about “structuring”.
.
Since Kent has made it clear he isn’t about to “face me” on that or related issues, maybe Peter J Reilly could arrange for you and I to take up the matter, starting with Kent’s “structuring” claim, what I have as Proposition #2 in my list of propositions for Kent to consider.
.
http://kehvrlb.com/kent-hovind-v-robert-baty-the-challenge-in-68-propositions
.
Proposition #2
.
Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
of $10,000 or less,
on the same day,
that total more than $10,000.
.
– Kent Hovind: Affirm
– Brent Shavnore: (To Affirm or Deny)
– Robert Baty: Deny
.

From Brent Shavnore

I am always down to capture some content and present some facts let’s make it happen!

.

From Robert Baty

Thanks for indicating your acceptance of my proposal. I didn’t notice where you explicitly indicated your position so, for now, I will indicate your position as agreeing with Kent Hovind as shown below:
.
Proposition #2
.
Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
of $10,000 or less,
on the same day,
that total more than $10,000.
.
– Kent Hovind: Affirm

– Brent Shavnore: Affirm

– Robert Baty: Deny
.
If that is correct, we can make it easy and agree on the logistical details that will allow the proposed discussion to develop.
.
I would suggest I set up a stand-alone, one-on-one thread on my Hovind page at the following link. You can join the group and then follow my set up with your first affirmative which should be designed to simply present what you think is a legitimate legal reference supporting Kent’s years long claim for my acceptance or rebuttal.
.
If you have some other alternative as to how we might produce the discussion, let me know. We should be able to work out the details and produce the discussion of this important public issue.
.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/kenthovindsworstnightmare/

.

From Brent Shavnore

What makes you think I agree with Kent Hovind?

.

From Robert Baty

It’s Kent’s position I am interested in discussing. If you don’t agree with him, I will gladly change your position to agree with mine as shown below. Just be clear as to where you stand.
.
Proposition #2
.
Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
of $10,000 or less,
on the same day,
that total more than $10,000.
.
– Kent Hovind: Affirm

– Brent Shavnore: Deny

– Robert Baty: Deny
.
If you think there may be some other subject of mutual interest that we might discuss, feel free to suggest it and I will let you know of my interest therein, if any.

.

From Brent Shavnore

If you intentionally deposit funds under 10k with the intentions of evading U.S currency transaction and reporting requirements – and there is a habitual record of this happening then yes – that is structuring.

.

From Robert Baty

First things first, Brent.
.
I think we need to be clear about where you stand regarding Kent Hovind’s position before we start on something else.
.
So, please just indicate, explicitly, whether the following is a correct representation as to where you stand regarding Kent Hovind’s years long claim. Like, your response should be something like, “yes, I deny Kent’s claim”, or “no, I agree with Kent”.
.
Proposition #2
.
Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
of $10,000 or less,
on the same day,
that total more than $10,000.
.
– Kent Hovind: Affirm

– Brent Shavnore: Deny

– Robert Baty: Deny

.

From Robert Baty

Brent, if you want to try and produce a discussion of our differences on structuring, based on what you wrote above, I would propose the following might be of interest to me.
.
The Brent Shavnore Structuring Proposal
.
Structuring requires an habitual record
of cash transactions of $10,000.00 or less
with the intention of evading U.S. currency
transaction reporting requirements.
.
– Brent Shavnore: Affirm
– Robert Baty: Deny

.

Update December 18, 2018

No further response from Brent Shavnore!

.



 

 

 

 


Comments

Brent Shavnore v. Robert Baty – “Structuring” — No Comments

Leave a Reply