Watch for Updates

.

.

Clickable Link to Video

.

https://youtu.be/y7mKTDaYkqc?t=17m5s

.

Transcription beginning around the 17:05 mark in above video:

.

All 5 of the things they accused him of were false.

.

But you know, I learned this when I went to court.

.

They know how to, they throw a thousand charges

at you to make it look like you got to be guilty of

something.

.

Like, they charged me with 45 counts of

“structuring”.

.

I didn’t break the law any on that at all or any

of the other charges but they put 45 counts in

there so the jury look like, wow, look at all the

stuff he’s being accused of.

.

It’s the same thing, 45 times.

.

Let’s suppose your speed limit is 40 and you are

going 45.  And the cop pulls you over after you

have driven for half a mile, 5 minutes, over the

speed limit.

.

So, since you drove, 2,600 feet, they charge you

with 2,600 counts of speeding.

.

One for every foot.

.

Multiply the charges.

.

The lawyers do this all the time.

.

I think it’s evil.

.

I can’t.

.

Somebody said, they asked me once, brother

Hovind, do you know how to save a drowning

lawyer?

.

I said, No.

.

He said, Good.

.

In my seminar I say, if all the lawyers in the

world were laid end to end around the equator,

that would be a good thing.

.

So, this guy’s walking through the cemetery,

and he sees a tombstone.  It says, here lies a

lawyer and a good man.  

.

I said, wow, they’re putting two people in the

same grave.

.

Never mind.

OK.

.

— Kent Hovind

— December 15, 2017 broadcast

.

(End transcription)

.

See: http://kehvrlb.com/proposition-2-hovind-v-baty-structuring

.

Proposition #2 That Kent Hovind Refuses to Debate:

.

Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
of $10,000 or less,
on the same day,
that total more than $10,000.

.

– Kent Hovind: Affirm

– Robert Baty: Deny

.

Rebuttal to Kent Hovind’s Speeding Analogy

.

Kent Hovind’s speeding analogy fails because his “structuring” crimes were not like the speeding incident he describes.

.

Kent Hovind’s “structuring” crimes would be analogous to a man who every Friday morning got in his car and in driving to work went 60 in a 40 mile per hour zone and every Friday was pulled over and given a speeding ticket.

.

Even that analogy will break down if you commit the fallacy of carrying the analogy too far.

.

“Structuring” is a criminal matter.
.

Speeding is a civil matter.

.

Enforcement of each is quite different.
.

The speeder gets a ticket if caught at or near the time of the speeding.

.

In the case of Kent’s criminal “structuring” and other offenses, he was properly investigated, charged, tried, convicted (on all counts), and sentenced.

.

.

Time marked link to video referenced below:

https://youtu.be/UgNvMGkTRHg?t=5m15s

.



 


Comments

Kent Hovind – Still Lying About His Legal Problems! — No Comments

Leave a Reply