Watch for Updates

.

.

Lydia A. Hubbell is a 50+ twice divorced woman.  She has 2 grown children, son & daughter, and one minor child, a daughter 10 years old.

Lydia has made the custody case of her 10 year old daughter a social media event, while the child’s father, to whom she was never married, remains silent, for the most part.  Reportedly, the pregnancy was unwanted and unplanned by either party.

Lydia had physical custody of the child without much controversy until the time the child might have been expected to enter public school.

Lydia has been described as a “hoarder” with a rather unkempt household who was intent on homeschooling the child.

The father of the child, reportedly, eventually intervened in an effort to insure the child got a public education.

And so it began, and Lydia has been escalating and promoting the controversy via social media for years now.  She has joined forces with others to advance the activist cause of whining about family courts and child welfare issues.

It’s been quite awhile since I engaged in trying to help Lydia with her problems, but when she posted the following promoting Raymond Schwab, another case I have followed and reported, I decided to again try to engage Lydia.

On November 18, 2018 the following exchange took place between Lydia and me, in the thread on her FaceBook page at the link below:

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=702405366810183&id=100011221786486

.

From Robert Baty

Lydia,
.
I think your people, like Raymond Schwab, to whom the above quote is attributed, like to sue for publicity purposes, not because there is merit to their claims. It’s kinda like they also like to run for some political office.
.
They seem to think its good for business, fund-raising, to be able to say “I sued so and so” or “I ran for office”.
.
I don’t think Raymond has won any lawsuits yet, and his current lawsuit includes his wife’s sister and parents as defendants.
.
That suit isn’t going anywhere yet, and may never “get off the ground”. I am trying to keep up with substantive developments via my article at:
.
http://kehvrlb.com/the-schwab-lawsuit-dead-on-arrival…
.
Raymond and I have a history that traces back through the related Kent Hovind, Baby Holm, and Lee Kenworthy/Shara Michelle cases. Raymond and Amelia didn’t get serious about getting their kids back until I and my people started covering his story and giving him advice. We tried to help the Holms as well, but they were determined not to parent and, sure enough, they got their parental rights terminated and the child was successfully placed in a permanent adoptive home.
.

From Lydia A. Hubbell

So, Robert, are you saying that you helped the Shwabs get their kids back and now you are saying they are threatening to “come after you?”

.

I can’t listen to this right now.

I am glad the Schwabs are reunited.

I think the Holms should have been left alone.

I don’t know enough about the Kenworthy case to comment much.
.

I really wish all I could do is share my own story and have it shared, but I share others, even if there were issues and questions and concerns that I didn’t fully explore.
.

In my own case, there was NO DCS involvement related to the initial deprivation of my parental rights and of my daughter’s rights to a relationship with her biological family.,

.

My child has never been in DCS custody.

.

Numerous witnesses have testified in court about my close bond with Dilara and my excellent parenting of my child and the fact that she was safe and healthy in my primary care. There is no history of drugs, abuse, neglect, violence, or anything that jeoparized her well-being in ANY way until her father took me to court.

.

My entire case is based on differences in opinion and lawyers ignoring the laws and facts and the negative effect court orders have had on my daughter’s well-being.

.

The only person I plan to sue any time soon is my daughter’s father. That is after years of people, including the D.A. telling me I should do so. That will come after I have filed my brief of the Appellant and any reply brief I need to in my current appeal of the custody order which I recently sought to be corrected, but my motion was denied.

.

From Robert Baty

Lydia
.
If you had the time to check the record, you would see that after my people and I started reporting on the Schwab case, as part of the extended coverage of the Holm case (the two couples were closely allied at the time), and making recommendations, the Schwabs who had been on a disaster course for about 3 years changed course consistent with our criticisms/recommendations.
.
Don’t look for Raymond and Amelia to give “us” any credit.
.
The Schwabs still can’t stand us for telling the truth about how they got into the situation they did, and that’s why Raymond still doesn’t like me and has made those threats against me.
.
I don’t see your case being much different, Lydia.
.
It would have been so easy for you to negotiate a custody agreement with your child’s father, but you chose a different route that has put you where you are today and you seem to be enjoying what publicity your are getting and the opportunity to be a part of a “cause”.
.
You may think you are at the end of the rope, Lydia, but things can get “worse” for you as far as your connections to your youngest child.
.
I will try to keep up and see how that plays out.
.
Thanks for unblocking me. It makes it easy to keep up with what is going on with you and your case.

.

From Lydia A. Hubbell

Why do you think it would have been “so easy” for me to negotiate a custody agreement with my child’s father?

.

We had a custody agreement negotiated.

.

He had a goal to cut me out of his daughter’s life and he lied and cheated and judges ignored the laws in order to help him do that.

.

Things cannot get worse as far as my connections to my youngest child because I have no connections. I have no rights. I have never harmed or endangered her and her father has done so and it is documented and admitted into evidence.

.

If you want to catch up, maybe you should read the Motion to alter or amend that was recently denied or the bogus child abuse allegations DCS has against me.

.

And, remember, the petition to restrict my parental rights was files LONG before I was exposing court abuses. And LONG before my daughter was emotionally damaged from being cut off from me.

.

From Robert Baty

Lydia,
.
I didn’t really expect you to agree with me, but the fact of the matter is that you and the child’s father, like thousands similarly situated, could have successfully negotiated a custody agreement.
.
Things change.
.
It doesn’t matter that you had an agreement.
.
Such are subject to change.
.
I don’t need to review the latest “stuff” that simply reflects the royal mess you have made out of your case.
.
If you decide you are more interested in having time with your daughter, instead of trumpeting your cause on FaceBook and street corners and wasting valuable governmental resources, it is possible, in my opinion, that with some serious professional help you and the child’s father could work out “an arrangement” regarding custody and visitation and related matters. If you got really serious, you might even work it out “pro se”.
.
It happens everyday, for those parents who are serious about the interests of their child and are actually willing to “work it out” instead of “fight, fight, fight”.

.

From Lydia A. Hubbell

The key is, ‘there are parents who are serious about the interests of their child and actually willing to “work it out” and in my case, the father has NEVER wanted to work things out, as evidenced by his statements about not wanting to discuss ANYTHING with ma and his statement in mediation about not wanting me to have ANY contact with my child.

.

From Lydia A. Hubbell

He wanted to negotiate only as long as he needed me to help raise Dilara. When parents disagree, it iw up to the courts to PUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD ahead of the desires of the parents and and that was not done in my case because the lawyers and judges did not follow the law.

.

From Robert Baty

You are referencing something, whether it be the case or not, Lydia, that has developed over time.
.
The record as I remember it, indicates clearly that you were the one who would not entertain a re-negotiated agreement for custody/visitation.
.
You have come across quite clearly as the one who had to have it your way, and that is simply not how it works.
.
Now, like others of your ilk, you have taken up the cause and joined forces with the likes of Connie Reguli.
.
From the perspective or legitimately trying to resolve a simple custody/visitation issue, shame on YOU Lydia.

.

From Lydia A. Hubbell

That is absolutely false.

.

The “finding” may state that, but the evidence does not. And my emails and text messages reaching out to engage in discussion and “compromise” were inadmissible as “heresay” and my sworn testimony was ignored.

.

The Court of Appeals “opinion” regurgitated findings of the court and allegations of opposing counsel.

.

I know I have “come across” as the one who is incalcitrant, but God knows the truth and anyone who is willing to look and listen to MY SIDE would see that I made many concessions and put up with a lot of crap that I probably should not have, but I did it for my child.

.

Unfortunately, with some people, a good deed does not go unpunished.

.

Even my emails before he got the order of protection against me (which he committed perjury to do) show how far I was willing to compromise with him. And in that case, I didn’t feel like I HAD to give him ANYTHING.

.

You have been decived and apparently want to stay that way.

.

I’m blocking you again.

.

If my “ilk” is those who believe children are entitled to healthy relationships with both parents and that our judges should support the Constitution and follow sound legal principles and not abuse their authority, then I don’t have anything to say to you and your free to spew your poison elsewhere.

.

From Robert Baty

Thanks for the confirmation of my opinions as to where the problems in your custody/visitation case lie, Lydia.

.

After the above, Lydia started a new thread at the link below and the screenshot below is what she had to say about the matter.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=702794903437896&id=100011221786486

.

In other articles on this site you can find information and my analysis of other cases mentioned above such as those of Raymond & Amelia Schwab, C. Clarke & Danielle Holm, Shara Michelle, Kent Hovind, and Lee Kenworthy.

There are over 300 articles on this site and they are listed in chronological order at the following link:

http://kehvrlb.com/a-chronological-list-of-articles-on-this-site

My venture on social media into the matter of family courts and child welfare began in December of 2016 when I heard that Kent Hovind’s man Brady Byrum was secretly helping the Holms promote their sovereign citizen theology that would eventually end in their parental rights being terminated and the child successfully being adopted into a permanent home.  The article at the following link provides a little background into how that got me started:

http://kehvrlb.com/kents-brady-byrum-meddling-in-baby-holm-case

.

Update November 18, 2018

Well, they could not rebut my analysis of Lydia’s case, but Lydia and others could have a “Bash Baty” party.  So they did, at the following link:

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=702794903437896&id=100011221786486

Just A Couple of Examples

.

Update November 19, 2018

Connie Reguli is one of the ringleaders of the movement Lydia has attached herself to.  Connie was even Lydia’s personal attorney for awhile.

Just as with the tax protest movement, the leaders talk big but rely on their minions oftentimes to do what they preach.

Such seems to be the case with Melanie Wolf who seems to be finding out that taking the advice of the leaders and loudmouths may not be so wise.

The following link is to the graphic below explaining the fix Melanie Wolf seems to have gotten herself into by following the likes of Connie Reguli and those who are likeminded.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1697223540511940/permalink/2299080570326231/

Lydia A. Hubbell presents us with what might be considered a classic example of “projection”, from her thread at (she is speaking to Susan Cobb about me):

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=702794903437896&id=100011221786486

What Projection Is

.



 


Comments

The Lydia A. Hubbell Case! — No Comments

Leave a Reply