Watch for Updates

Will C. Clarke Holm put on his sovcit act again this week when he returns to court for the reported dependency hearing?

.

A cast 2018

.

Link to Child Support Hearing YouTube Broadcast:

.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gE3vhyWbnzo

.

C. Clarke Holm Introduction to Broadcast:

.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1826254040954882/permalink/1919821631598122/

“Shared” with FaceBook/Holm Permission.

.

From: C. Clarke Holm

Date: May 20, 2017

Time: 5:10 PM MT

.

This audio is from the child support hearing on April 25th.

This is what I recorded.

You will notice in the beginning that the prosecutor comes over to me off the record and tries to coerce me to sign an affidavit to then give them jurisdiction.

Then he tells the judge and she tells me that she can’t start until I do.

Well, I did not consent and I stated that I was only there in special appearance.

The judge then began to record and start the official record.

This is fraud and coercion and conversion tactics.

The entire hearing is fraud, for my wife is sitting next to me as my evidence that I am not in a divorce nor a custody battle.

This petition was for spousal support.

So the prosecutor was representing a fictional character that was trying to extort money.

There was no one next to him that had signed an affidavit to bring me into court.

This is fraud.

Also on the petition they have named our baby which is fraud and they got him a social security number which is against our religious right.

I do get a little frustrated dealing with these passive minded people but I’m getting better with dealing with them inside their arena of court.

As you will hear, they have no proof of facts that what they are doing is not fraud.

The judge does not even rebut that they are kidnappers.


.

Followup from C. Clarke Holm via above thread:

A cast 2017

.


.

Observations by Others:

A cast 2019

.

My comment posted below above noted YouTube broadcast video:

.

A cast 2016

.

I copied and posted the graphic for the broadcast below should the video disappear from YouTube link:

.

A cast 2015

.

A cast 2023

A cast 2024

.

A cast 2025

.

UPDATE May 22, 2017 – Comment From Quatloos Date  May 21, 2107

.

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=11298&start=40

.

From: GlimDropper

Date: May 21, 2017

Time: 8:04 PM

.

“I listened to bull crap artists like Marc Stevens
and all I got was my baby taken away.”
.

You’d think you’d get immune to the stupidity after a while and in many ways you do. But a young couple, their lives ahead of them and with a new born baby but deep enough down the rabbit hole to not realize that the rabbit hole is why no rational person will give them their kid back, it’s heart wrenching.

Millennia of evolutionary instinct, not only to procreate but to defend your progeny all swept away by sovcit mythology and the dark irony being that it also blinds the parents as to who is to blame for it all. Robert’s link makes it clear that the mother is fully on board with the bull crap, it would be hard for Alabama DHS to find a worse home environment for Baby Holm to grow up in (even assuming his birth parents actually do have a home now).

I point fingers at Marc Stevens not because I know he is the guru Clarke Holm is following but just because Clarke parrots a near note perfect “what evidence or facts do you have to prove those laws apply to me” pitch a few dozen times in that recording. Loosely speaking that hearing sounds like it was to determine if the Holm family had sufficient income to support a child or perhaps if they qualified for public support* and even if they did that isn’t a reason to deny them custody of their child. But the whole Marc Stevens “20 questions” game is doing the exact opposite of bringing their baby back.

Stevens is a smug smarmy grifting bastard profiting from the pain he inflicts on the people gullible enough to believe him about anything. Even if he has had no contact with Mr. and Mrs. Holm his teaching and the Holm’s stupidity in believing them are 90+% of the reason the only way they will see their child will be supervised visits.

* Edit to add, it seems the hearing was to see if C. Clarke could be compelled to pay child support.

(Very late edit to correct spelling.)

Last edited by GlimDropper on Mon May 22, 2017 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total. 
(End comment.)
.

.

Mr. Holm gets some new advice today, and a new reference for outside counsel.

.

Bwahahaha!  Maybe Mr. Holm will take this advice in preparation for his hearing tomorrow!

.

A cast 2026