Watch for Updates

.

Clickable Link to Following Post

https://www.facebook.com/danielle.holm.395/posts/215784525664756

.

Image below from Danielle Holm broadcast found at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD-AH1qmNCw&t=297s

.

Danielle, you and your people have often been observed making such promises about some supposed “big reveal” coming soon, and all have failed to fulfill the claims made for them.

.

You and your husband, C. Clarke Holm, have repeatedly claimed to have nothing to hide while refusing to give an account regarding what is going on with you, him and your custody case involving Baby Holm and the State of Alabama.

.

Recently, your #1 public promoter, Susan Cobb, claimed you would do “anything” to have Baby Holm returned to you, and there is now good reason to believe that Susan was flat out lying.

.

You and your husband have repeatedly claimed that you have been working so hard in your efforts to have Baby Holm returned to you, and such claims have been shown to be false.

.

What some have observed is that you and your husband have, from the beginning, been determined to promote your false narrative and showcase your “sovereign citizen” theology and antics which have, perhaps with your deliberate intent, guaranteed that Baby Holm would not be returned to you, and he has not been returned to you.

.

The time is ripe for termination of your parental rights as to Baby Holm, and it has been reported that the State of Alabama has been successful, because of your behavior, in obtaining a restraining order against you in order to keep you away from Baby Holm and those involved in his case and protecting his interests.  You have repeatedly refused to tell what you know about the status of any termination of parental rights action.

.

My Challenge to You, Danielle Holm

.

Proposition #1 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in taking custody of Baby Holm in October of 2016, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

.

.

Proposition #2 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in retaining custody of Baby Holm, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-102.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

 

.

.

 

.

.

.

That Danielle & C. Clarke Holm are just putting on an act, performance art, on-line regarding their custody issues involving Baby Holm and their theological musings, is evident in the following recent exchange which clearly shows they have things to hide and can speak and write reasonably and sanely when they so desire.

.

.



 


Comments

Challenge to Danielle Holm! — No Comments

Leave a Reply