Watch for Updates

Originally Posted April 7, 2019
by Robert Baty

.

John Gentry is one of many on the spectrum disorder involving those anti-government, anti-child welfare, anti-family court people that have taken to social media to try and make names for themselves and rail against the Government.

I recently accept a challenge from John Gentry and it didn’t take long for him to tuck tail and “run”; makes my job so much easier when my adversaries resort to such childish, spiteful tactics as John exhibited during our brief encounter.

Link to thread on John’s FaceBook page where most of our encounter took place:

https://www.facebook.com/john.gentry.3348/videos/2428193377467139/

John Gentry’s own proposition from which he tucked tail and ran after I accepted his challenge to discuss it and either accept his argument or offer a rebuttal:

Proposition

.

A judge being on the Board of Judicial Conduct is a second office of trust prohibited by Article 6, Section 7 of the Tennessee State Constitution.
.
– John Gentry: Affirm (Gentry Defaulted by Withdrawing)

– Robert Baty: Deny

.

Following, as I get the time, will be the substance of our exchange, in reverse order, starting with the latest posts.

.

From John Gentry April 7, 2019 6:47 PM MT

I’ll just ignore and block you on social media. I’m still open to debate and am happy to coordinate that through email but I tire of your posts on my page.

.

From Robert Baty April 7, 2019 4:59 PM MT

.

John Gentry, I guess the notion of negotiating as is normal in such cases, is a concept that is beyond your comprehension.
.
I have noticed no response to my last email wherein I asked you if the reference included was the program you thought I should download in order to use ZOOM.
.
I am busy, too, John, but I don’t play that “I am busy game” like you do.
.
You again failed to accept your own proposition for debate. I will consider you have conceded to me that proposition. Let me know if you have another you wish me to consider.

.

From John Gentry April 7, 2019 

.

You have become annoying to me. I am a busy man, even now preparing for more testimony before congress. I will debate or converse with you on Zoom.

.

The venue will be Kirk’s law corner.

.

The proper means to address coordinating with me is via email.

.

You are welcome to send follow up email.

.

I receive a lot of correspondence.

.

I have many demands of my time so occasionally follow up email to me is necessary.
.
Thus far I have little interest in you as your dialogue is not meaningful.

.

From Robert Baty April 7, 2019 4:13 PM MT

.

I disagree.
.
I think written debates are much more efficient and meaningful if properly developed. You have already proved worthy of my time in demonstrating your tendency towards evasion. To debate me it is only necessary that we negotiate in good faith the logistical details and follow through.
.
For instance, we need to agree on a venue, a proposition, and other relevant details. For instance, you made a claim which I challenged, and you have yet to agree to debate your own claim.
.
Here it is again for reference:
.
Gentry v. Baty Proposition
.
A judge being on the Board of Judicial Conduct
is a second office of trust prohibited by Article 6,
Section 7 of the Tennessee State Constitution.
.
– John Gentry: Affirm

– Robert Baty: Deny

.

From John Gentry April 7, 2019 3:20 PM MT

.

I encourage debate that helps me sharpen arguments.

.

Perhaps you will prove worthy of my time.

Thus far I only note unsupported positions from you.

.

To debate me it is necessary to provide constitutional basis or statute in compliance with constitution that support your argument. US Supreme Ct opinion is generally respected as well.

.

I care not about others or what others think.

Keep your comments to comstitutional law.

.

I do not engage in triangle conversations about others not present. To do so show poor etiquette as you have now shown.

.

Debate is best in person (zoom) and not in comments.

I look forward to rational debate with you.

.

References

.

.

Update April 8, 2019

It appears John Gentry is a very sore loser.  We had a brief email exchange this morning, and he seems to have “lost it” as far as the 2 of us ever getting together for a proposed “debate” on matters of mutual interest.

More importantly, it appears John has resorted to evidence tampering; deleting from his FaceBook page the posts noted above.

Following are the screenshots I took of the above-noted posts; for the record, and in light of what appears to be evidence tampering by John Gentry.

Link to John Gentry’s thread where posts appeared:

https://www.facebook.com/john.gentry.3348/videos/2428193377467139/

.

Upon further consideration, it now appears John Gentry has been even busier with his evidence tampering; deleting even more posts from his FaceBook page.

Here’s a dozen more posts, not presented in this original article above, but which also appear to have been deleted by John Gentry.

.

Update April 9, 2019

It appears John Gentry continued his evidence tampering and has now removed all of my posts to his page thread at the following link:

https://www.facebook.com/john.gentry.3348/videos/2428193377467139/

.

Interestingly, and in demonstration of his hypocrisy, JOHN GENTRY lets the following posts stay in the above-referenced thread with his explicit notice and approval:

 

.

Someone using the name of Bill Zehler has now asked JOHN GENTRY about all of that:

 

.

See JOHN GENTRY run!

 

.

Steven Allen also responds to John Gentry!

 

.

A Randy Smeltz has now also added to that thread!

 

.

John Gentry, of course, is not the first to turn tail and run from an opportunity to “get Baty”.  Link to related article on this site:

http://kehvrlb.com/kent-hovind-v-robert-baty-on-structuring

 

.

Time-marked link to YouTube exchange illustrated below:

https://youtu.be/xty7SQn9fIQ?t=275

 

.

Update June 6, 2019

Like all the good wannabe advocates, John Gentry has found a political office to make a run for so he can add “former…candidate” to his resume!

https://www.facebook.com/Gentry4ThePeople/

 

.

Update April 1, 2020

John Gentry tried to intervene in federal court on behalf of Neely Blanchard, a woman recently arrested for kidnapping her children from someone else who, apparently, had legal custody of those children.

Gentry, apparently knowing he had no “standing” to file on behalf of Blanchard, who remains in jail, filed a flurry of stuff in an effort to “create a record” he will try to exploit later for his own agenda.

My thanks to the Court for quickly disposing of the case, via DISMISSAL.  Following are files containing the DISMISSAL ORDER and the Memorandum & Opinion in support thereof.

Blanchard Gentry Memorandum Opinion on Dismissal 04012020

Blanchard Gentry Dismissal Order 04012020

Update April 2, 2020

Gentry doesn’t give up; tries remonstrance gimmick!

Blanchard Gentry Motion for Relief 04022020 (1)

Update April 3, 2020

Gentry’s Paper Terrorism Continues!

Blanchard Gentry Relief Motion 04032020

Blanchard Gentry Recusal Motion 04032020

.

Update April 14, 2020

It appears Gentry has also been meddling in the Blanchard case on the local level, and even the knuckleheads in “the movement” don’t like Gentry’s meddling.

https://www.facebook.com/neelymckenzie21/posts/10219983931601542

.

Update April 29, 2020

The Court has gone to the trouble to DENY all the motions received from John after the DISMISSAL.

Update November 16, 2020 – Breaking News!

It is being reported that Neely Blanchard has been arrested as the prime suspect in the murder last night of Christ Hallett (E-Clause), an associate of John Gentry.

YouTube Coverage by Meko Haze

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6pM9mLEk84

Update November 17, 2020

Some anonymous spook on Twitter asked me for proof that Hallett was a con man.  That’s rather subjective, and I didn’t engage in bantering with him about that matter, under the circumstances there.  However, I did look up this material and will post it to Twitter as reference as well.  It shows Hallett falsely presenting himself to a federal court as if he were a lawyer and in the promotion of a frivolous suit ultimately dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Bruce Nathan 2018 Federal Complaint

Bruce Nathan Motion for Restraining Order

Neely Petrie-Blanchard Filed Bankruptcy in 2015!

She was discharged in 2016!

She had about $50,000.00 in unsecured debt!

Blanchard 2015 Bankruptcy

Update November 18, 2020

Ante Peric, an advocate legend in his own mind, has posted a YouTube regarding the Hallett case and boasting of having given Hallett the E-Clause idea and had sex with Neely Petrie-Blanchard before Hallett did, and lots of other things, including his crack legal expertise.  Following is an example, bwahahahahaha, regarding his own federal case.

Ante Peric Federal Complaint Nov 2017

Ante Peric Memorandum and Order Dec 2017

Update April 2, 2021

Raw Story article on Chris Hallett murder:

https://www.rawstory.com/qanon-obsessed-mother/

Related Wall Street Journal article:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-online-conspiracies-turn-deadly-a-custody-battle-and-a-killing-11617376764

.



 


Comments

JOHN GENTRY v. ROBERT BATY! — No Comments

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>