Watch for Updates

.

There’s no good reason to believe Susan Cobb, and good reason to not believe Susan Cobb, but I will play along and see if Susan Cobb, who has shown herself unable to handle the truth regarding the Baby Holm custody case, will come out of hiding and talk with me about the matter, and whether or not C. Clarke & Danielle Holm will do as I suggest, in full or in part, and as otherwise might be deemed appropriate by the State of Alabama.

.

Susan Cobb’s post tonight, February 26, 2018, as taken from the following FaceBook thread on the page of C. Clarke Holm at:

https://www.facebook.com/christian.clarke.holm/posts/1619033968172151

One of Susan Cobb’s FaceBook addresses:

https://www.facebook.com/susandunncobb

.

One of Susan Cobb’s False Holm Narrative websites:

https://letourbabiesgo.com/

.

Susan Cobb

.

My Suggestions to Susan Cobb & The Holms

.

If Susan Cobb’s claims are correct, then let C. Clarke & Danielle Holm demonstrate it in the following ways (not intended to be an exhaustive list), if it is not already too late, beyond the point of no return (practically speaking):

.

They should file a proper appeal of their reported restraining order.

.

They should properly contest the termination of their parental rights.

.

They should admit that Baby Holm is not being held hostage by kidnappers.

.

They should work with the State of Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR), in good faith, in order to convince the State that they are willing and able to provide the necessary and appropriate care for Baby Holm, which may include but not be limited to, according to reports, proper mental evaluations for both C. Clarke & Danielle Holm.

.

They should admit that Robert Baty’s positions on the following propositions are correct.

.

Proposition #1 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in taking custody of Baby Holm in October of 2016, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

.

.

Proposition #2 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in retaining custody of Baby Holm, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

.

Alternatively, Susan Cobb should consider admitting that she was flat-out lying about C. Clarke Holm’s willingness to do “ANYTHING to protect and recover” Baby Holm; and C. Clarke & Danielle Holm, in any case, need to affirm or deny Susan Cobb’s claim.

.

I sent Susan Cobb the link to this article via her latest tweet on Twitter, as shown below:

 

.

Danielle Holm appears to imply that Susan Cobb was, in fact, lying about her and C. Clarke Holm’s willingness to do “ANYTHING” to affect the return of Baby Holm to their custody.  This is from Danielle’s latest FaceBook page thread at:

https://www.facebook.com/danielle.holm.395/posts/214803112429564

and

.

More evidence that Susan Cobb was flat out lying; from C. Clarke Holm’s FaceBook thread at:

https://www.facebook.com/christian.clarke.holm/posts/1623126024429612

.

More evidence from C. Clarke Holm’s FaceBook page that Susan Cobb was, in fact, flat out lying.

https://www.facebook.com/christian.clarke.holm/posts/1619033968172151

.

Susan Cobb convicts herself of flat-out lying in posting the following to C. Clarke Holm’s latest thread on his FaceBook page at:

https://www.facebook.com/christian.clarke.holm/posts/1626532820755599

.

 

.



 


Comments

Suggestions for Susan Cobb! — 2 Comments

  1. They are not doing everything they should be doing to get their child back which is why the Holms and Susan Cobb always change the subject when asked about what they are doing to get their child back.

    Danielle has explicitly stated that getting her child back was too many hoops. Taking a mental evaluation, getting treatment for mental issues, and living a way that is safe for a child is just too much to ask for and god forbid anyone suggest they WORK!

    If they really cared about that child he would have never been in the situation to require removal to begin with. Danielle would have made Christian get treatment or left him, they would have had everything a newborn baby needed, including a car seat seeing that they hitched rides ALL THE TIME, and they would have been receiving appropriate pre-natal care the entire time instead of wandering around the country like drunken hobos who are in a state of delusion.

    After removal, if they cared they would have done what was required of them to get their child back instead of fighting back like angry toddlers every step of the way. They would have let them see the donated trailer that was filled with donated items all courtesy of the community they have shit on. Nope, they wanted to fight and refused a visitation but expected a rental receipt to suffice. They would not have been making threats and building a community of other loser parents and nut jobs who encourage them to never be allowed to get their kid back. They would not have been begging for money for things to get the baby back knowing damn well they were not going to buy them because material items are the satan virus.

    They are too in love with themselves to love each other or that baby. If you love someone who is schizophrenic, you do not encourage them to stop taking their medicine.

    Christian is mentally on another planet and cannot even hold a conversation anymore. He is to the point of rambling the same nonsense over and over and over again. That is not healthy. Danielle is not too far behind except that she still has a lot of vindictive tendencies in her right now. Her false accusations against her mother’s husband came out because she was not getting her way. I think Danielle is still stuck in her high school mentality and does not get that everyone else has grown up. She wants what she wants when she wants it with no responsibility on her end. If she does not get it she throws a fit and makes up lies to try to get other people in trouble like her story of assault 2 months after the baby was born. She thinks this is all a fun game and will gain her popularity.

    Susan Cobb is exploiting them for her own attention. Susan spent how long running away from CPS because her and her husband’s mental illness made them a danger? She has written books that hardly no one has read and no one will. She even claimed that one of her books would be good for professionals to read and use. LMAO! She does make a good case study though and that certainly would make for good material for the study but no professional is going to listen to an unmedicated psycho on how to help their patients.

    As for the rest of their supporters and the 3 people mentioned above, I cannot wait for law enforcement to finally say enough already and arrest them all. Since the Holms have a restraining order out against them they let their unstable supporters do the harassing now, which is still a violation of their restraining order. The sad part is that they cannot force any of them into a psych ward yet.

    One supporter has gone above and beyond with her harassment and has even made threats. Her excuse? She’s crazy. Yep, that one should get her a prison stint in a padded cell.

    I have yet to see a supporter of the Holms who is mentally stable and has not lost their kids for legitimate reasons.

    These pathetic supporters are pushing a pointless cause instead of helping real cases where children should not have been taken. Why do they not help these other cases? Probably because those people are complying and they’re jealous that they have a chance to get their kids back.

    • @ NotASovidiot
      .
      That’s a pretty good analysis.
      .
      I have been wondering lately about the possible inflammation of paranoia in C. Clarke & Danielle Holm.
      .
      It seems they have literally gone into hiding the last couple of months or so; at the time the restraining order was being reported and the termination of parental rights was being speculated. Perhaps they have more legal problems than even we are aware of.
      .
      They keep their secrets well while flooding social media with the same ol’ same ol’ false narrative symptomatic of increasingly severe mental issues. Is it for real, or just an act consistent with their continuing efforts to publish their story when the time is right.
      .
      In December of 2016 (their federal suit), the Holms claimed they only had C. Clarke’s SS Disability for income (see paragraph #72 at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/bbmudj35z06n3k4/Holm3.pdf ).
      .
      Now they claim they no longer receive that income and have repeatedly refused to explain how they are financing their wayward lifestyle which they appear not to want to have cluttered up with a child. Like, how did they swing the deal on the new SUV; and all the travel? Did C. Clarke’s trust fund bonanza finally come through for him (his grandfather did die and apparently he was the money man of the family and was the one C. Clarke spent so much time caring for, according to C. Clarke)?
      .
      So many secrets, and they are pretty good at keeping them.
      .
      So many things they need to come clean on, but likely never will.
      .

Leave a Reply