UPDATED: September 25, 2016 about 10:10 AM MT

.

Proposition #64(a)

.

Kent Hovind was a man that the Bible teaches was eligible for remarriage on September 24, 2016 based on the doctrine of death, adultery, and/or desertion.

.

  • Kent Hovind: Affirm
  • Robert Baty: Deny

.

Proposition #64(b)

.

Mary Tocco was a woman that the Bible teaches was eligible for remarriage on September 24, 2016 based on the doctrine of death, adultery, and/or desertion.

.

  • Kent Hovind: Affirm
  • Robert Baty: Deny

.

NOTE: In denying the propositions I am only proposing that Kent Hovind has not convincingly established his claims as to what the Bible might teach on the subject and has not convincingly established that he and/or Mary meet the conditions he has determined applicable according to his interpretation of the Bible.  My position, should Kent come out and engage the debate, will be to either accept Kent’s arguments in support of his affirmative position or to explain why he has not persuaded me of the propriety of his claims.


.

Link to video time mark referenced below:

.

https://youtu.be/rciFwtN1cz4?t=9m55s

a-cast-247


Comments

Proposition #64 – Kent’s & Mary’s Marriage Eligibility! — No Comments

Leave a Reply