(Page Under Construction)

Proposition for Discussion

(To be determined)

a-cast-430


I have set up this page to archive a discussion, should there be one, in response to David Buzulak, a former adversary who made an appearance today in the comments section of a YouTube video found at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5Xa2gDWn88

Should David or his named champions, Devvy Kidd, Bill Conklin and/or Joe Bannister, be serious about having a discussion about some disputed matter of mutual interest, I have set up this page to present the exchange, beginning with the negotiations, such as they may be.

This main page will be reserved for the discussion, should the proper arrangements be agreed upon and the discussion proceed.

The comments section below will be for the negotiations.

Should David and/or his champions not present themselves here and pursue the negotiations in good faith, this page may be used to archive the pre-negotiation banter which David seems to prefer to serious discussion.



Comments

Buzulak/Bannister/Kidd/Conklin v. Robert Baty (under construction) — 33 Comments

  1. The banter seems to have come to an end, and Buzulak seems to have made it abuntantly clear that neither he nor his stated champions are going to be coming around and advancing the negotiations for a debate over some substantive disputed point of mutual interest. I will try to archive the banter in this thread; with each post being one of the messages, in order, to the comments section at:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5Xa2gDWn88

    How it started:

    1. From David Buzulak

    My brother (Denlinger), you’re taking Kent’s words TOO literally.
    He doesn’t think he’s any pope or any outreach from him is the vatican.
    This was silly.
    He was simply stating that he is EXEMPT from being taxed.
    In other news, David Gibbs is known to be a shill.
    He’s a fake.
    A liar.

    ——————————————–

    • 2. From Robert Baty

      I know you!

      What do you know, if anything, about all those disappearances associated with Kent Hovind and his highly touted and long anticipated “Kent Hovind Innocence DVD Series”?

      Like, what is up with all of that?

      You got a clue?

      I posted an article yesterday about it.

      Here’s the link: http://kehvrlb.com/dr-dino-shut-up-by-the-batman

      Bwahahahahahaha!

      Looks like I get to take some credit for shutting up Dr. Dino as far as that matter is concerned.

      —————————————————————————————————————

      • 3. From David Buzulak

        LOL! Well, well, well…if it isn’t the TROLL of trolls.
        Mr. Baty the ex IRS agent.
        How’s your Leftist life going?

        4. From David Buzulak

        “disappearances”??

        “shutting up Dr. Dino”??

        5. From David Buzulak

        I see your website but you never did answer where the IRS is in the Constitution?
        I missed that.
        And the “due process” that the IRS ignores.
        Anyways…Leftists will always whine and cry for their theft.

        —————————————————————

        • 6. From Robert Baty

          I see you are up to your old schtick.
          You are as comedic as your YEC hero Hovind.

          Alas, if you don’t know enough and aren’t up to date enough to know about all the disappearances and how he’s been shut up regarding his latest legal scheme, you seem not to be the one to talk to.

          I’ll wait for the news to come out about that and related matters.

          Besides noticing the consequences, all the disappearances, in that earlier article I referenced for you, Buz, I earlier rebutted Kent’s and Brady’s foundation legal blunder in my article at:

          http://kehvrlb.com/brady-byrum-kent-hovind-flat-out-wrong-on-form-4789

          By the way, it is not necessary to find “IRS”, or anything else in the Constitution for it to be constitutional, but you never were any good at framing issues and defending your position.

          Bwahahahahahhaaha!

          —————————————————————————————–

          • 7. From David Buzulak

            Yeah…my “schtick” is the Constitution.
            And my “schtick” is science.
            And when you give me your “probable cause” I’ll give you your smack down.
            Agreed?
            BTW, I’m at your site on F/book.
            Where are you?
            I HATE this Youtube forum.
            So..why not show up where I’m at on F/book?

            8. From David Buzulak

            “The Internal Revenue Service has lost a lawyer’s challenge in front of a jury to prove a constitutional foundation for the nation’s income tax, and the victorious attorney now is setting his sights higher.”

            http://www.wnd.com/2007/07/42749/

            9. From David Buzulak

            And I challenge Baty to prove evolution.
            Here’s my prediction, which is at 100%, he can’t do it.
            GUARANTEED 100%.
            Prove me wrong Bobbo!
            All he’ll show us is a variety of a kind/species.
            Even kids in school learn this in Mendel’s pea experiment!
            BUT…IRS agents think they’re God and I’m part of an army to prove them wrong.
            So…Bobbo…the floor is yours.

            ——————————————————–

  2. 10. From Robert Baty

    I figure you are flat out lying in your representation of that case you are so high on.

    Bwahahahahahaha!

    Nothing new there.

    Your schtick is not the Constitution, despite your pretensions, or science.

    I don’t need to prove evolution; everyone already accepts evolution.

    Maybe if you ever decide we might have something of mutual interest to discuss, we can begin in good faith to negotiate for an exchange of ideas on some mutually agresable topic.

    Right now, my main interest is in what is behind all those Hovind disappearances. Alas, that is a subject you appear to admit you have nothing to add.

    —————————————————————————————

    • 11. From David Buzulak

      I asked for your probable cause on Hovind. You have yet to produce it. Was it a paid informant? Was Kent dealing drugs? Was Kent keeping money in his home(LOLLL!!!). Maybe it was Kent depositing gasp more than 10k or less than 10k at any given time or times???? Oh, the horror!

      Yeah…I know your silly “refutations”. And I provided 2 links or more for you. I’m not sure why you don’t debate Bannister; Devvy KIdd; or Cryer for goodness sakes and just get your info on that IRS law that states we MUST pay this income tax. (actually I know why).

      Anyways, I do know more about evolution than thou. And, as I correctly PREDICTED, you did NOT give me any evolution. And the reason is that you cannot do so. 100% PREDICTION rate going strong. And…if you have a friend that think they can….by all means. Set that up for me!

      “Bwahahahahahaha!

      Nothing new there.”

      ——————————————

      • 12. From Robert Baty

        I see you’ve gone to “spamming” one of my FaceBook pages with your version of “paper terrorism”, as if you had something productive to say other than simply demonstrate you are an unworthy correspondent, in part, because you steadfastly refuse to deal in good faith in trying to discuss important public issues.

        Find out what is up with Hovind and those disappearances, why don’t you, if you can, and report back.

        As to you thinking you know of some Champion who would dare to take me on regarding the legality/constitutionality of the personal U.S. income tax, send them forth and we will see what they are made of.

        Kent Hovind will not face me.
        Kent’s champion Brady Byrum will not face me.

        If you think Devvy Kidd is your Champion, bring him around and maybe we can start the negotiations and produce that discussion.

        Bwahahahahahhaa!

        Devvy Kidd will not face me either, so say I!

        There you go, Buz, something you can surely prove me wrong on if I be wrong.

        I’ll look forward to setting up something with Devvy if you get him to come out and prove me wrong.

        ——————————————————

        • 13. From David Buzulak

          Spamming? Eh…informing is what I do. I’m waiting on any answers you can give me on what I’ve posted. You mentioned Kidd in response to my post. You say she won’t debate you? Proof? BTW, Devvy is a woman dufus! Bwahahahahahhaa! So…I do believe you’re lying…AGAIN!

          Bannister? I know Cryer died-poor chap.

          But you can cite this mandatory law from the IRS telling us we MUST do this income tax thing. I’ll forward it to my guys. I’m wondering why you’ve never done this?

          “Neither the IRS nor the Congress can cite an authorizing law or regulation.

          3) Citizens cannot “voluntarily” file a federal income tax return without surrendering their 5th amendment right not to bear witness against themselves.”

          (ooos…right?)

          So…I’m wondering why you’re using this antiquated / dinosaurian forum?
          Why not go to Facebook???
          Skeered aren’t you?

          14. From David Buzulak

          Oh…here’s that website.

          http://www.givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/usatoday.htm

          15. From David Buzulak

          Oh…and your article about the geologic column and millions of years? Debunked. And easily done:

          http://creation.com/does-geologic-column-exist

          “It has been claimed that the geological column as a faunal succession is not just a hypothetical concept, but a reality, because all Phanerozoic systems exist superposed at a number of locations on the earth. Close examination reveals, however, that even at locations where all ten systems are superposed, the column, as represented by sedimentary-thickness, is mostly missing. In fact, the thickest local accumulation of rock is only a tiny fraction of the inferred 600-million year’s worth of depositions. The global ‘stack’ of index fossils exists nowhere on earth, and most index fossils do not usually overlie each other at the same locality. So, even in those places where all Phanerozoic systems have been assigned, the column is still hypothetical. Locally, many of the systems have not been assigned by the index fossils contained in the strata but by indirect methods that take the column for granted—clearly circular reasoning. Thus the geologic column does not exist and so does not need to be explained by Flood geology. Only each local succession requires an explanation and Flood geology is wholly adequate for this task.”

          —————————————————–

          • 16. From Robert Baty

            No Devvy Kidd!
            No Bannister!

            I got no opponent on the income tax issue, so it seems.

            No worthy opponent.

            Big Talk Buz, talk, talk, talk, talk.

            He’s got nothing.

            He can’t even in good faith carry on negotiations for a reasonable and reasoned discussion of some point of mutual interest which may be disputed.

            Buz ain’t up to it.

            Hovind won’t face me.
            Byrum won’t face me.
            Kidd won’t face me.
            Bannister won’t face me.

            Still Buz hasn’t brought us anything about the matter at hand; what is up with all the disappearances regarding Kent Hovind’s big reveal regarding his legal/tax problems.

            What is going on with that, Kent Hovind?
            Brady Byrum, maybe you can tell us!

            Is it just because I really am that good so as to have “shut them up” when they were bragging about shutting me up???

            I’m going to consider that to be the case, but they need to come out and come clean and admit to it or give us another better explanation.

            ————————————————-

  3. I think I ran out of space in the first thread above, so we’ll continue here.

    17. From David Buzulak

    But I’m here facing you Bobby! You’ve never challenged Kidd-you didn’t even know she was a WOMAN! LOL! And Bannister? C’mon…you’re out of your league.

    Now I’m a pretty reasonable guy. Since you’ve trolled Hovind for …what 15 years now….can you just tell us how Hovind is some evil criminal?

    So…let’s start at the beginning? You have some sort of probable cause. Right? Just list that probably cause…and I, as the cop, will listen to this sordid tale.

    Now remember folks…this is an EX-IRS agent.
    He knows he MUST establish some sort of probable cause.
    We’ll start there.

    ———————————————————-

    • 18. From Robert Baty

      Still out in the weeds I see!

      Buz is the one who wrote, in relevant part:

      – “Why not debate this Devvy Kidd?”

      Short answer: Because Buz can’t get her to come out to me!

      I’m waiting!

      We’ll see what she’s made out of if Buz can get her to be his Champion.

      Buz, you are not here facing me; you are here running off at the mouth having no intention of seriously even beginning the negotiations for a discussion on a disputed topic of mutual interest.

      My experience has been, Buz, you just aren’t man up to it.

      “Paper terrorism” is your schtick, and you’ve been doing that all day today.

      If you want to begin the negotiations, I propose that we do so via a stand-alone page on my website at kehvrlb.com.

      I’m thinking you won’t even begin in good faith by accepting that venue to publicly present the negotiations.

      Prove me wrong, Buz, and let me know you are willing to meet me there and begin the negotiations.

      You will be welcome to mirror the negotiations in a venue of your choosing.

      —————————————————————

      • 19. From David Buzulak

        We’ll give Bobby time to respond before I come crashing down on him some 5th amend. material.

        Meanwhile…Bobby boasts that nobody will face him. I’ve faced him several times on F/book and smoked the lad. And this was on structuring / probable cause / private property…etc.

        This is HIS expertise. Not mine.

        Meanwhile…he goes about badmouthing YEC’s….and I confront him. Challenge him. Challenge his friends. And yet….no takers. Not on piece of evidence to back up evolution. I 100% guarantee Baty a failure here and w/ the Gestapo (ie-IRS).

        Yet he drones on about nobody facing him. Silly little bureaucrat.

        20. From David Buzulak

        Bobbo!…over here. You posted I won’t debate you…yet I’m right here. Answer my above question to you.

        Give us this sordid tale of Hovind the criminal. Let’s take it slow…so folks don’t get confused. You’re the expert…we’re the “peons”.

        Start w/ your probable cause. You MUST establish this first before going anywhere.

        We’re all ready Bobby.

        —————————————–

        • 21. From Robert Baty

          Still nothing from Buz about all those mysterious disappearances.

          As for our previous engagements, Buz is unrepentant and performs the same as before; as if running off at the mouth would make him a winner.

          Silly little Buz!

          I’ll go ahead and set up a page at kehvrlb.com for our negotiations and for any of his champions, if he dare get them to show up, to work on producing an exchange on some dispute point of mutual interest.

          If Buz doesn’t repent and show up, or bring forth his champion(s), it will also become a deposit to archive this latest exchange demonstrating Buz is quite an UNworthy, UNrepentant correspondent.

          ———————————————————————–

          • 22. From David Buzulak

            And there you GO! Baty dispatched!

            Ol Bobby CANNOT and WILL NOT debate me. Not on Youtube…not on F/book.

            Bobbo is clever enough to know that I KNOW what I’m talking about when it comes to probable cause / private property / 4th, 5th amendments…etc.

            You see this? This is your IRS. They’re liars. They’re con artists. They’re the Gestapo. This is your enemy America…right here.

            Anytime Baty, you want to give me that probable cause…you tag me. I’m always around.

            23. From David Buzulak

            Since Bobby lied about Devvy…maybe he’ll lie about this guy? 50k reward if Bobby Baty can give this guy the law for income tax.

            http://www.anti-irs.com

            THE FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLAR REWARD

            Bill Conklin, a pro-se litigant and tax litigation paralegal in Denver, Colorado has offered a $50,000 reward for almost twenty years for anyone who can show him: (1) What statute makes him liable to pay an income tax and (2) How he can file a tax return without waving his Fifth Amendment Rights.

            24. From David Buzulak

            See…what Gestapo agents like to do (like some of my former law enforcement supervisors like to do) is HIDE behind some “law”. Baty? He hides behind a structuring law which is a violation of our right to private property – 4th amend. He hides behind the FORCE of govt agencies and illegal edicts that usurp the protections afforded us by GOD himself.
            BUT…that’s not a problem for any bureaucrat! Illegal and unconstitutional laws make them $$$$$!!!

            Anyways…out for the night folks. You’re welcome. I take a modest bow.

            ———————————————

  4. And we again start up here to continue the archiving of the exchange with Buzulak!

    25. From Robert Baty

    Bwahahahahahahhahaa!

    Ever the showman is Buz and Kent and their heroes like Kidd, Bannister and Conklin!

    If any of them want to begin the negotiations, I set up the page.

    Posts not pursuing the negotiations in good faith will be subject to removal.

    Here’s the link:

    http://kehvrlb.com/buzulakbannisterkidd-v-robert-baty-under-construction

    We have the venue, and as I previously stated, Buz is welcome to mirror the developments on his own venue of choice.

    I propose that the next step is to find a proposition in dispute which we both, or one of Buz’s champions, might have a mutual interest in discussing.

    Meanwhile, I note that Buz has yet to deal with the substantive matter in this venue; what is up with all those disappearances regarding Kent’s “Innocence DVD Series”.

    26. From Robert Baty

    Oops!

    Try this link to the page set up for the debate and negotiations:

    http://kehvrlb.com/buzulakbannisterkiddconklin-v-robert-baty-under-construction

    ——————————————

    • 27. From David Buzulak

      Ever the showman???

      Folks…this Gestapo agent CONTACTED ME. I didn’t contact him. NOW??? He’s upset because I demand he answer questions?

      THEN…he runs to some website he constructed to debate me? Or Kidd? Or Bannister? (Ol Bobby hit his head somewhere).

      Now…folks…I’ve had this done before. Aaron Ra tried this on me. Ra wouldn’t answer questions on F/book…he demanded I go to his website. Why? We’re right here. You provoked this debate in public on Youtube Bobby…now let’s finish it on Youtube.

      Unless you’re too much a coward?

      Probable cause to even speak to Kent? Just tell us what that was.

      28. From David Buzulak

      Prediction: Ol Bobby will want to “flee the scene” and bury what I challenge him w/ on his silly little website.

      Let’s do this right here Bobby. You’re the expert. I’m just a gumshoe ex cop. You’re the boss. You tell me to go out to Dinosaur Land and arrest Kent Hovind. I ask: what’s the charge?

      You say???

      ———————————————–

      • 29. From Robert Baty

        Funny how I recall Buzulak whining about this venue, and now he wants to “do it” here.

        OK, I’ll start another thread for the negotiations here and we’ll see how far we get in arriving at a proposition in dispute that we are both interested in discussing.

        And a reminder: Buz indicates he has no idea what is going on with the disappearances of Kent’s “Innocence DVD Series” promotions.

        ————————————————–

        • 30. From David Buzulak

          Sure…sure. I did “whine” about the forum. It’s an antiquated silly system. But that’s not the issue.

          The issue is simple. You’re claiming Kent did some evil deed. Okay…I’m a pretty level headed guy. What did he do? Why is this man so evil-in your sight?

          I KNOW you won’t answer because this isn’t a federal court where you have a judge to protect you. I’m going to hammer you w/ the constitution.

          Anyways, as for Kent’s DVD series? Don’t know. I don’t follow Kent Hovind. I don’t need any DVD series to tell me what I already know about the IRS and it’s lying agents; commissioner..etc. It’s all documented.

          ———————————–

          • 31. From Robert Baty

            I set up the proposition for you in a separate stand-alone thread here, Buz. Deal with it openly and honestly and in good faith, or not.

            As to you hero, Conklin, I ran across this ready reference:

            http://tpgurus.wikidot.com/william-conklin

            (Begin excerpt.)

            Oddly enough, Conklin lists many of those cases on his web site as “wins,” but he never explains how he can “win” a case in which the court rules against him.

            Conklin has offered $50,000 to anyone who can show him how to file an income tax return without waiving his 5th Amendment rights. One person gave him the correct answer (which is to omit any incriminating information from the return) and then sued him for the $50,000, but the court ruled in Conklin’s favor, saying that because Conklin was the one who had to be satisfied, he was the “sole arbitor of the sufficiency of any answer tendered,” it was solely up to him whether or not to award the prize, and he could reject answers he didn’t like even if the answers were legally correct. Walder v. Conklin, Case No. 01-CV-1038-B (U.S.D.C. Wyo. 12/13/2001). (Believe it or not, Conklin brags about this decision on his web site, listing it as a “win” and not realizing that the decision shows him to be a fraud because his “reward offer” is meaningless.)

            (End excerpt)

            ———————————

  5. And again!

    32. From David Buzulak

    So….and I have to laugh here…you ‘answer’ Conklin and not me???

    Bwhaaaaaa!!!! C’mon Bobby, why don’t you answer MY question?

    33. From David Buzulak

    BTW…the “correct” answer??? What was it again??

    Neither the IRS nor the Congress can cite an authorizing law or regulation.

    3) Citizens cannot “voluntarily” file a federal income tax return without surrendering their 5th amendment right not to bear witness against themselves.

    So…there is NO ANSWER that is right if one is saying that you must submit the form! C’mon duh!

    34. From David Buzulak

    One last time Bobby:

    Let’s do this right here Bobby. You’re the expert. I’m just a gumshoe ex cop. You’re the boss. You tell me to go out to Dinosaur Land and arrest Kent Hovind. I ask: what’s the charge?

    You say???

    ———————————————–

  6. 34. From Robert Baty

    Buzulak again, in classic style, shows he deals in bad faith, and has no intention of advancing the negotiations either as to venue or proposition.

    Typical from Buz; he’s got nothing but hot air and a lot of time to spend at his keyboard.

    Here’s what Buz would not face in a stand-alone thread here, much less face on my kehvrlb.com page previously cited:

    (Begin quote.)

    Buzulak v. Baty Debate – Negotiations for a Proposition

    Here’s the one Kent Hovind considers fundamental to understanding his legal/tax problems, and I agree. Will Buzulak accept it and proceed in negotiating how to best advance that discussion?

    Proposition for Discussion as Between David Buzulak and Robert Baty

    Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
    of $10,000 or less,
    on the same day,
    that total more than $10,000.

    – David Buzulak: To Affirm
    – Robert Baty: To Deny

    David is welcome to reject the above proposition and offer one of his own choosing for my consideration. –

    (End quote.)

    Make your intentions clear, Buz.

    Do you accept Kent’s proposition and join him in so affirming and wish to discuss it, or not?

    If not, be explicit in so stating and provide an alternative for me to consider.

    Or not.

    ————————————————-

    • 35. From David Buzulak

      LOL!!!!!!

      I take a bow. No answers from the Gestapo agent! That’s you do it folks-use the Constitution and make them PROVE their case. Baty can’t do it. Rather…he runs off to his squirrely little website and pretends he’s a keyboard warrior. Okay…let’s give Bobby a participation trophy!

      Ol Baty can’t even muster any evidence for probable cause! Must break several amendments to do what the IRS does. That’s why IRS stooges are hired help from Dimwit Univ.

      Anyways…as always w/ Bobby…an utter waste of time. LOL!!!! BTW, tell your evolution friends I’m available anytime.

      36. From David Buzulak

      Oops…and btw….here’s the REST of the story about Conklin that the Gestapo agent Bobby didn’t tell you:

      Conklin has also tested his theory with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. About twenty years ago, he filed an unsigned return that contained financial information and payment. However, he gave the IRS District Counsel the power of attorney to sign the return for him if they could do so without waiving his Fifth Amendment Rights. The lower Court Judge told Conklin that if he ruled in Conklin’s favor he would overturn the Federal Tax System. After five years he ruled against Conklin. He determined that Conklin’s Fifth Amendment Argument is frivolous because the Fifth Amendment applies only to “compelled testimony.” The court took the position that a tax return is not compelled or required. The Circuit Court upheld the lower Court and sanctioned Conklin $6,000 for arguing the frivolous argument of law that individuals are required to file returns.

      >>>>Conklin appealed the sanction arguing that it is not unreasonable for a person to think that filing returns is compelled by the government. He also asked interested people from around the country to write to the Tenth Circuit and thank them for ruling in Conklin vs. United States of America that tax returns are not compelled testimony and to send in a contribution to help pay the fine. So there you have it, filing tax returns is either voluntary and the Fifth Amendment doesn’t apply, or it is required and the Fifth Amendment does apply. After twenty years, the reward still stands. It does seem that the government has a problem with the filing “requirement,” doesn’t it?< <<<<<<<< http://www.anti-irs.com

      ——————————————-

      • 37. From Robert Baty

        Buz proves my point again he’s got nothing and is an UNworthy correspondent!

        The offer remains outstanding:

        (Begin quote.)

        Buzulak v. Baty Debate – Negotiations for a Proposition

        Here’s the one Kent Hovind considers fundamental to understanding his legal/tax problems, and I agree. Will Buzulak accept it and proceed in negotiating how to best advance that discussion?

        Proposition for Discussion as Between David Buzulak and Robert Baty

        Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
        of $10,000 or less,
        on the same day,
        that total more than $10,000.

        – David Buzulak: To Affirm
        – Robert Baty: To Deny

        David is welcome to reject the above proposition and offer one of his own choosing for my consideration. –

        (End quote.)

        ————————————————————–

          • 39. From Robert Baty

            More proof yet that Buz is not up to a discussion of any particular point in dispute that might be of mutual interest.

            Buz has nothing.
            Buz’s champions have nothing.

            (Begin quote.)

            Buzulak v. Baty Debate – Negotiations for a Proposition

            Here’s the one Kent Hovind considers fundamental to understanding his legal/tax problems, and I agree. Will Buzulak accept it and proceed in negotiating how to best advance that discussion?

            Proposition for Discussion as Between David Buzulak and Robert Baty

            Structuring requires 2 or more transactions
            of $10,000 or less,
            on the same day,
            that total more than $10,000.

            – David Buzulak: To Affirm
            – Robert Baty: To Deny

            David is welcome to reject the above proposition and offer one of his own choosing for my consideration. –

            (End quote.)

            ————————————————————-

    • 41. From Robert Baty

      Buz has my proposition and, as far as I can tell, he has neither affirmed or denied it and indicated whether or not he wants to pursue that discussion should we disagree.

      I assumed he would join with Kent in affirming.

      If Buz does not agree with Kent, or just does not want to discuss Kent’s foundational legal claim, he needs to make that clear and submit his alternative proposition for my consideration.

      (HINT) “Probably cause Bobby?” is not a proposition!

      ——————————————————————–

        • 43. From Robert Baty

          Buz has my proposition and, as far as I can tell, he has neither affirmed or denied it and indicated whether or not he wants to pursue that discussion should we disagree.

          I assumed he would join with Kent in affirming.

          If Buz does not agree with Kent, or just does not want to discuss Kent’s foundational legal claim, he needs to make that clear and submit his alternative proposition for my consideration.

          (HINT) “Probable cause Bobby?” is not a proposition!

          ——————————————————————–

          • 44. From David Buzulak

            Not only a Gestapo agent but a spelling NAZI to boot!!!

            Wonderful!!! Wonderful!!!

            Probable cause Bobby? IF you can just answer that one? No need to run off into your smoky den.

            ——————————————-

  7. 45. From Robert Baty

    Buz has nothing, but his keyboard bullying!

    As for me, I’m still claiming credit for shutting up Kent Hovind about his legal problems. He’s been scrubbing the Internet of his “Innocence DVD Series” promotion. He won’t come out. He won’t send out his champion.

    Of course, Kent still meekly tries to claim he’s innocent, but he won’t come out and face the facts. Kent Hovind and his people “can’t stand the truth”.

    See:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxlCnS7VEAAvpoX.jpg:large

    Additional References:

    http://kehvrlb.com/brady-byrum-kent-hovind-flat-out-wrong-on-form-4789

    http://kehvrlb.com/kent-hovind-v-robert-baty-the-challenge-in-64-propositions

    http://kehvrlb.com/dr-dino-shut-up-by-the-batman

    ———————————————————————————————-

    • 46. From David Buzulak

      LOL!!!!!!!
      The spelling NAZI calls me a bully!!!

      Oh…my the irony meter just broke!

      —————————————————-

      (So, David Buzulak had the last word! – RLBaty)

      —————————————————-

Leave a Reply