Watch for Updates
.
Link to John Lamb’s promotional video:
.
https://www.facebook.com/john.lamb.16121/videos/1224449827698598/
.
.
TEXT
.
“Another case I been following and wanting to help. It is really close to my heart, is the Baby Holm case.
.
I’m going to try to see what I can do to get some help.
.
We need…more people in Alabama to start speaking out against the Holm case; the Baby Holm that has been taken from the Holm family for almost 2 years coming up in October.”
.
John Lamb
Febuary 19, 2018
From about the -6:35 mark in above referenced video
.
My Challenge to John Lamb
.
Proposition #1 for Discussion
.
The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in taking custody of Baby Holm in October of 2016, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.
.
– Robert Baty: Affirm
–
– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny
–
– John Lamb: Deny
.
.
Proposition #2 for Discussion
.
The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in retaining custody of Baby Holm, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.
.
– Robert Baty: Affirm
–
– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny
–
– John Lamb: Deny
.
.
Anne Moran is one of the latest, vocal supporters of C. Clarke & Danielle Holm and she has most recently posted the following to the John Lamb video thread referenced above:
.
.
Comments
John Lamb, bring it on! I’m waiting! — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>