Watch for Updates

.

Link to John Lamb’s promotional video:

.

https://www.facebook.com/john.lamb.16121/videos/1224449827698598/

.

 

.

TEXT

.

“Another case I been following and wanting to help. It is really close to my heart, is the Baby Holm case. 

.

I’m going to try to see what I can do to get some help. 

.

We need…more people in Alabama to start speaking out against the Holm case; the Baby Holm that has been taken from the Holm family for almost 2 years coming up in October.”

.

John Lamb

Febuary 19, 2018

From about the -6:35 mark in above referenced video

.

My Challenge to John Lamb

.

Proposition #1 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in taking custody of Baby Holm in October of 2016, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny

– John Lamb: Deny

.

.

Proposition #2 for Discussion

.

The State of Alabama was legally and factually justified in retaining custody of Baby Holm, based on the provisions of Alabama Code Section 12-15-306.

.

– Robert Baty: Affirm

– C. Clarke/Danielle Holm: Deny

 John Lamb: Deny

.

.

Anne Moran is one of the latest, vocal supporters of C. Clarke & Danielle Holm and she has most recently posted the following to the John Lamb video thread referenced above:

.

 

.


Comments

John Lamb, bring it on! I’m waiting! — No Comments

Leave a Reply