Watch for Updates

Lena Willes (aka Arlena Willes) had her son removed from her custody by the State of Arizona as a result of her treatment of her son regarding health matters.

In the process of time Lena found her way to the likes of David Jose and he and others apparently convinced Lena to try using sovcit, anti-government, anti-child welfare “magic words”, and so, among other things, she did, and she has filed a frivolous federal case; the docket history as of today is shown below:

Files containing various documents reflected in the above history are shown below:

Willes Writ 01072019

Willes Assignment Notice 01072019

Willes Pro Se Notice

Willes Handbook for Self Represened Litigants 02012019

Willes Motion for Default 02122019

Willes motion for hearing 030519

Willes Writ 01072019

Willes affidavit in support of habeas corpus 030519

.

I tried to talk to Lena via her FaceBook page, but she would have none of my opinions regarding her efforts in federal court being frivolous.  So, she blocked and has since removed most all of the mention of her case from her personal FaceBook page.  She may also have no de-activated her personal page or other made in inaccessible (or maybe FaceBook took action against it so as to make it inaccessible).

I will consider to monitor the case which, if you ask me, is destined for eventual dismissal as frivolous.

.

Other References

.

Lena’s Current Husband

.

Lena’s FaceBook Address

https://www.facebook.com/lena.willes

.

Lena on Twitter

https://twitter.com/LenaWilles

.

“Bring Jonathan Home” FaceBook Address

https://www.facebook.com/BringJonathonHome/

.

Lena’s YouTube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQMc6UGeTr02bjPHV4HJBSA/videos

.

Lena’s GoFundMe #1

https://www.gofundme.com/attorney-fees-for-kidnap-case

Lena’s GoFundMe #2

https://www.gofundme.com/66321qo

.

My exchange with Lena via her FaceBook page

.

Related article memorializing my run-in with David Jose and Gary Lynn Scott is found on this website at the following link.  It is noted that in Gary’s case it has been converted to a habeas corpus, or he has requested that it be, and he also, like Lena, has filed a motion for default judgment and affidavit.  Gary’s case, also like Lena’s, appears quite frivolous and going nowhere except to an eventual dismissal.

http://kehvrlb.com/david-jose-v-robert-baty

.

LENA WILLES UPDATE – 03/14/2019

 

Looks like the State is getting serious about bringing the Lena Willes case to a reasonable conclusion, and Lena has filed a supplement to her federal case (apparently, Lena is still simply ignoring the State’s efforts as she indicated she would).

.

The attached file contains her federal case supplement.

Willes Supplement of 03132019

.

Update March 16, 2019

Lena Willes & Frances Amato – A Cute Couple!

Link to thread on Frances’ page where post was made:

https://www.facebook.com/toccarenon/posts/813267705718071

Frances has reference to the possibility of Lena talking to John F. Malloy who is featured in this recent Medical Kidnap article:

http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/13/retired-arizona-judge-reveals-corruption-in-legal-system/

.

Link to thread in “Stop CPS…” FaceBook group where Randi Erickson tries to cover for Lena’s failure in her federal case:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/StopCPSFromLegallyKidnapping/permalink/815916455412231/

Others have noticed how “they” always seem to have an explanation as to how the failed case simply didn’t quite get the magic words right instead of admitting they were fundamentally flawed as frivolous.  It is, on some level, quite comedic to observe how the promoters, would-be activist, scammers, always have an explanation for the failure in specific cases; explanations that fail to properly admit to the frivolous nature of the effort and their anti-government theology.  Go to thread referenced above in the “Stop CPS…” group for further information regarding my engagement with Randi Erickson.

If you are not familiar with Randi Erickson, here is a link to a thread on my Hovind FaceBook page where I document what appears to be a flat-out lie by Randi regarding who she is and what she is up to in promoting her anti-government agenda:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/kenthovindsworstnightmare/permalink/1185470244955436/

.

Update March 19, 2019

Lena has filed yet another document and is demanding the release of her child, the federal court setting a hearing, and letting us know she intends to ignore a scheduled termination of parental rights hearing set for next month.

Willes Affidavit 03192019

.

Update March 20, 2019

Randy Scott Davis has some comments about Lena’s situation.

Link to FaceBook thread where comments posted:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/kenthovindsworstnightmare/permalink/1187997191369408/

Link to Randy’s personal FaceBook page:

https://www.facebook.com/croatan.indians

.

Update March 26, 2019

Lena is not giving up; files “NOTICE”:

Willes Notice Entered 03262019

.

Update March 29, 2019

A FaceBook Video From Lena:

http://kehvrlb.com/lena-willes-the-magic-words

.

Update March 30, 2019

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=294461588185945&set=a.119875948977844&type=3&theater

.

Update March 31, 2019

For clearer copy of above image and text, see:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1834010930038919&set=pcb.1195329140636213&type=3&theater&ifg=1

.

It may be far from over, but Lena’s federal case appears to have been “dead on arrival” and we are just waiting for the coroner to show up and “call it”.

.

The YouTube Version

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlDZfLLiYnw&t=10s

.

Lena also just posted this, though it appears to be from before Christmas 2018; featuring Jamie Starr Sparks Wehrheim Johnson.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQH5joqRACc&t=5s

.

Update April 3, 2019

Lena back on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gumiUyscoR8&t=43s

.

AND

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1keA_sZ-yE

.

Update – April 4, 2019

Lena Willes Federal Case DISMISSED Without Prejudice

Willes Order 04042019 (1)

.

Willes Judgment 04042019

.

Update April 5, 2019

.
Lena had about 15 minutes and didn’t hear her say anything even resembling “my federal case dismissed yesterday” and then telling us what she plans to do as far as appeal or giving up on it or whatever.
.
Nope she spent 15 minutes in cryptic narrative and Bible reading.
.
However, for those who know the status of her federal case, her comments seem to clearly indicate she knows what happened.
.
 
.
.

Update April 6, 2019

Lena still can’t bring herself to just tell her audience that her federal case was DISMISSED!

https://www.facebook.com/lena.willes/posts/296237128008391

.

Some testimony at a hearing in 2013 from Lena Willes regarding her son’s problems with schooling.

http://www.acluohio.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/2013_0312ArlenaZeekTestimony-SeclusionRestraint.pdf?

.

Lena, really, what are you talking about?

.

Update April 8, 2019

.

Update April 12, 2019

Lena did file a notice of appeal and things are moving along as a result, but I am thinking the case will never be certified for appeal and that will be the end of the effort to appeal the dismissal of her federal suit.

Willes Notice of Appeal 04112019

Willes Motion for Relief 04112019

.

Update April 19, 2019

Lena filed her motion for reconsideration and other miscellaneous relief at the same time as she filed her notice of appeal.  The motion was never ruled on and so the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has remanded the case to dispose of the motion before it considers the appeal, if Lena wants the appeal to proceed once the motion is resolved.  There is also the matter of certification to resolve.

Willes Appeals Court Order 04192019

.

Update April 24, 2019

https://www.facebook.com/groups/kenthovindsworstnightmare/permalink/1211371805698613/

Lena, it is dismissed, dismissed, dismissed.

I am not only “thinking” it is dismissed, it is dismissed!

Your burden is to convince the Court that was in error, and there is no good reason to believe there is any way that is going to happen.

Yes, Lena, you can appeal, all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if it makes you happy, but all that is going to do is waste limited Government resources. That’s why some consider what you are doing “paper terrorism”.

.

Update April 28, 2019

To: LENA WILLES
.
Look around. It appears to me that the State has both legal and physical custody of your son.
.
The State was/is under no obligation to response to your federal habeas corpus suit, if that is what you mean by your jurisdiction. That suit was dismissed, and there is no good reason to believe you are going to be able to do anything to change that.
.
Based on what Lena has posted in the graphics section of the post referenced in the screenshot below, the applicable law in Arizona is as follows and, from what I can tell, the State has a pretty much iron-clad case for taking custody of Lena’s child and retaining custody.
.
I report.
You decide.
.
.
8-821. Taking into temporary custody; medical examination; placement; interference; violation; classification; definition
.
A. A child shall be taken into temporary custody only pursuant to one of the following:
.
1. An order of the superior court.
.
2. Subsection D of this section.
.
3. The consent of the child’s parent or guardian.
.
B. The superior court, on a dependency petition filed by an interested person, a peace officer, a child welfare investigator or a child safety worker under oath or on a sworn statement or testimony by a peace officer, a child welfare investigator or a child safety worker, may issue an order authorizing the department to take temporary custody of a child on finding that probable cause exists to believe that temporary custody is clearly necessary to protect the child from suffering abuse or neglect and it is contrary to the child’s welfare to remain in the home.
.
C. If a child is taken into temporary custody pursuant to this section, the child’s sibling shall also be taken into temporary custody only if independent probable cause exists to believe that temporary custody is clearly necessary to protect the child from suffering abuse or neglect.
.
D. A child may be taken into temporary custody without a court order by a peace officer, a child welfare investigator or a child safety worker if temporary custody is clearly necessary to protect the child because exigent circumstances exist.
.
E. In determining if a child should be taken into temporary custody, the court, peace officer, child welfare investigator or child safety worker shall take into consideration as a paramount concern the child’s health and safety.
.
F. A person who takes a child into custody because an exigent circumstance described in subsection K, paragraph 2 of this section exists shall immediately have the child examined by a physician who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17 or a health care provider who is licensed pursuant to title 32 and who has specific training in evaluations of child abuse. After the examination the person shall release the child to the custody of the parent or guardian of the child unless the examination reveals abuse. Temporary custody of a child taken into custody because an exigent circumstance described in subsection K, paragraph 2 of this section exists shall not exceed twelve hours.
.
G. A child who is taken into temporary custody pursuant to this article shall not be held in a police station, jail or lockup where adults or juveniles who are charged with or convicted of a crime are detained.
.
H. A child shall not remain in temporary custody for more than seventy-two hours excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays unless a dependency petition is filed.
.
I. To execute an order authorizing temporary custody, a peace officer may use reasonable force to enter any building in which the person named in the removal authorization is or is reasonably believed to be.
.
J. A person who knowingly interferes with the taking of a child into temporary custody under this section is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
.
K. For the purposes of this section, “exigent circumstances” means there is probable cause to believe that the child is likely to suffer serious harm in the time it would take to obtain a court order for removal and either of the following is true:
.
1. There is no less intrusive alternative to taking temporary custody of the child that would reasonably and sufficiently protect the child’s health or safety.
.
2. Probable cause exists to believe that the child is a victim of sexual abuse or abuse involving serious physical injury that can be diagnosed only by a physician who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17 or a health care provider who is licensed pursuant to title 32 and who has specific training in evaluations of child abuse.
 
From: Robert Baty
Date: April 29, 2019
.
To: LENA WILLES
.
I had a little extra time and thought I would give it another run in light of your posts illustrated in the screenshot below.
.
Here goes:
.
#1.
.
The State could have taken custody of your child, without a court order, based on exigent circumstances.
.
Maybe it did, but I haven’t noticed you posting any documents related to that.
.
#2.
.
The State could have, and did apparently, take custody on September 9, 2018, based on a court order.
.
When the State takes custody pursuant to a court order, it is sufficient that your notice indicate the taking is pursuant to a court order and it is not required that the notice indicate that such taking was due to exigent circumstances.
.
#3.
.
Here are what I figure are the relevant parts of the law in support on my findings, Lena:
.
A.R.S. 8-821(A)
.
.
8-821. Taking into temporary custody; medical examination; placement; interference; violation; classification; definition
.
A. A child shall be taken into temporary custody only pursuant to one of the following:
.
1. An order of the superior court.
.
2. Subsection D of this section.
.
D. A child may be taken into temporary custody without a court order by a peace officer, a child welfare investigator or a child safety worker if temporary custody is clearly necessary to protect the child because exigent circumstances exist.
.
K. For the purposes of this section, “exigent circumstances” means there is probable cause to believe that the child is likely to suffer serious harm in the time it would take to obtain a court order for removal and either of the following is true:
.
1. There is no less intrusive alternative
to taking temporary custody of the child
that would reasonably and sufficiently
protect the child’s health or safety.
.
Lena, you are welcome!
.

Update April 30, 2019

Lena is now upset that the paternity issue has come up and someone said Jonathan was born out of wedlock.  So, she claims she is going to prove today that that is a lie by posting the birth certificate and marriage license.  Oh well, we’ll see what that is all about; maybe.

 .

 

.